Guide

Laser, plasma or waterjet: which cutting method for your part

Updated

The cutting method is usually the fabricator's decision, but it drives the edge you get and part of the price, so it is worth understanding what they are choosing between.

The four processes

Cutting processes compared on what a buyer notices
ProcessStrengthsLimitations
LaserExcellent edge quality and accuracy on thinner material, fast, clean holes and fine detail, minimal secondary workThickness limits depending on the machine, and reflective materials such as copper and brass need the right laser type
PlasmaFast and economical on thicker steel plate, widely availableCoarser edge with more taper and dross, so it suits structural work more than visible or precision parts
WaterjetCuts almost any material, no heat-affected zone, good for thick sections and heat-sensitive alloysSlower and generally more expensive per metre, and the edge has a characteristic texture
Sawing and shearingCheapest way to cut sections and straight lines to lengthStraight cuts only, no profiling

The heat-affected zone, and why it can matter

Laser and plasma cut with heat, which changes the metal locally at the cut edge. For most fabrication that is irrelevant. It becomes relevant on hardened materials, some aluminium alloys, parts that will be heavily formed near the edge, and anything where the specification restricts it. Waterjet cuts cold, which is precisely why it is used on those jobs despite costing more per metre.

How the choice shows up in your price

  • Edge quality you asked for. If the cut face is visible or gets welded to a tight fit, the cheaper process may need grinding afterwards, and that labour can exceed the saving.
  • Nesting. How efficiently your parts pack onto a sheet decides how much material you pay for. Simple, similar shapes nest well; awkward one-offs do not.
  • Number of pierces. Every hole starts with a pierce, which takes time. A plate with two hundred holes is a very different cutting job from one with four.
  • Small internal features. Very small holes relative to material thickness may not be cuttable and will be drilled instead, which is a separate operation.

What to tell the fabricator

Rather than specifying the process, tell them the outcome: whether the cut edge is visible, whether it needs to be square rather than tapered, whether it is a mating face, and whether heat input near the edge is restricted. A good fabricator will pick the cheapest process that meets those, and they may well have all of them in the building. Specifying "laser cut" on a thick structural bracket that nobody will ever see just adds cost.

Send a DXF or STEP file if you have one. Cutting from a PDF drawing means someone redraws your part, which costs time and introduces mistakes.

Questions, answered directly

Is laser cutting more expensive than plasma?

Per metre, usually, particularly on thicker plate where plasma is at its most economical. But laser leaves a cleaner, squarer edge with less secondary work, so on parts where the edge matters the finished cost can be lower. Specify the edge quality you need and let the fabricator choose the process.

When should I use waterjet cutting?

When heat at the cut edge is a problem, when the material is not suited to thermal cutting, or when the section is thick and the edge quality still matters. It cuts cold with no heat-affected zone, at the cost of a slower and generally more expensive cut.

What file format should I send for cutting?

A DXF for flat profiles or a STEP file for 3D parts, plus a drawing showing material, thickness, tolerances and finish. Sending only a PDF means someone has to redraw the part, which adds cost and risks errors.

Send the drawing, get real prices.

Two minutes of questions and UK fabricators who can make your part quote you directly. Free, no obligation.

Get fabrication quotes